Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Potential ICE use of former FCI Dublin prison→At a glance
- Public comments
- 8
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 16, 2026.
Public comments (8)
A nearly 50-year resident urged the council to reconsider its earlier refusal to act on FCI Dublin, noting Dublin and Alameda County both passed resolutions against ICE presence.
City Council - Jun 16, 2026 · 30:10 →A 70-year-old grandmother who protests weekly with her 91-year-old mother asked whether it would still be safe to protest if ICE comes to the Tri-Valley, and asked the council to speak out.
City Council - Jun 16, 2026 · 35:38 →Returned to restate his concern and asked the council to issue a statement of concern or opposition to an ICE presence in the community.
City Council - Jun 16, 2026 · 38:31 →A descendant of immigrant grandparents warned that ICE presence raises arrests in surrounding communities and urged the council to go on record opposing a detention center, like Dublin and Alameda County did.
City Council - Jun 16, 2026 · 40:33 →Argued an ICE detention center would disrupt the local economy and community, citing conditions in detention and impacts seen in other cities.
City Council - Jun 16, 2026 · 47:00 →A recent Amador Valley graduate said reopening the facility known as the 'rape club' would be complicity in violence and urged the council to say no to FCI Dublin.
City Council - Jun 16, 2026 · 50:33 →Read a first-person account from a Minneapolis mother describing life under ICE operations, arguing the same would happen here if a facility opens in Dublin.
City Council - Jun 16, 2026 · 52:31 →Sympathetic to the concerns but said no ICE plans for the area have been announced, calling the fear premature and asking residents to give city leaders time.
City Council - Jun 16, 2026 · 55:45 →